 Southern Exposure Border Conflict Kudos Poverty Pictures
Southern Exposure
I enjoy the mini-profiles very much, but Greg Veis did make
one remark about the distinguished South Carolinian that rankled
["Herb Kirsch
'49, fourteen years in office," November-December
2005]. (He must be very young, with no roots of any kind in the
South.)
Referring to Representative Kirsh as a "Democrat in an archly
conservative district who also happens to be the only Jew in
the House," and suggesting that such a distinction would
be "fantastical" grist for a sitcom, shows an abysmal
ignorance of South Carolina history. Jewish Carolinians, and
Jewish Southerners generally, found themselves so welcome as
they settled in the South that they not only participated in
civic service, but produced some outstanding statesmen over the
last 200 years. Southern Jews, as did most Americans living south
of the Mason Dixon Line, set aside their concern with the issue
of slavery and passionately embraced the Secessionist cause as
they fought fiercely in defense of states' rights and the homeland
they loved.
For a very readable history of Jews in the South, please have
a look at The Jewish Confederates by Robert Rosen. You will see
that our fellow alum Herb Kirsch is part of a distinguished tradition,
an excellent representative of his constituents, and quite likely
to feel a body, mind, and soul connectedness to South Carolina
that only a native-born Israeli living in Jerusalem might completely
understand.
Conway Lucas Winkler '59
Missouri City, Texas
Border Conflict
Letter-writer Manfred Rothstein ["Forum," November-December
2005] states that Israel is always right and good, while the
Palestinians are guilty of causing "civilian victims of
suicide bombings and plane hijackings." He then equates
the Palestinians with mass murderers and finally refers to
the Duke University Palestinian Seminar as "an exercise
in academic futility." He also managed to take some cheap,
vicious, and mostly false shots at the Catholic Church.
Mr. Rothstein conveniently fails to mention that for forty
years Israel has maintained its brutal and inhumane occupation
and oppression of the Palestinians. In addition, Israel kills
nearly four times as many Palestinians as Palestinians kill
Israelis. Also, Israel continues to defy both international
law and the U.S. "road map to peace" by building
thousands of permanent homes in the occupied territories every
year, by building a monstrous, apartheid wall that runs miles
into existing Palestinian territory, and by refusing to enter
negotiations for a just, two-state peace settlement with the
Palestinians.
While the U.S. should be an honest broker for peace in the
Middle East, unfortunately we continue our one-sided, pro-Israel
foreign policy, which ensures that there will not be a fair
and necessary solution to this conflict.
Ray Gordon
Baltimore, Maryland
Kudos
Just wanted to comment on the article
by Jacob Dagger in the January-February
2006 issue ["Top
of the Crop"]. I very much enjoyed the article, but was
even more impressed by the quality of the writing. Not only
do I wish that I could write as well as Jacob, but I wish this
article had been written several years earlier so that I could
have used it while my daughter was looking at schools.
Keep up the good work!
Jay Harris
(Parent of Jillian Harris '08) Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania
Poverty Pictures
David Brady, in his "Under the
Gargoyle" piece ["Lies, Damned Lies, Poverty Statistics," January-February
2006], denounces the "profoundly dishonest official
poverty statistics." I wish he could get his discouraging
words out to a much broader audience, noting in particular
that "the richest country in the world has the most
poverty of any industrialized democracy." Perhaps that
would help discourage future millions who would come here
illegally from seeking opportunities that they lack in their
native lands. To their credit, though, most are legitimately
seeking work, not welfare.
Whether they are illegal immigrants or U.S. citizens,†many
of our poor have little education, few skills, and little
or no facility in the English language. They are adding to
our poverty rolls, if not the statistics, but not necessarily
because they are†simply victims of inadequate government
programs.
Wallace Kaufmann made an excellent point in his Forum letter
(same issue): "[W]ithout illegals forced to work for
minimum or below-minimum wages and benefits, affluent Americans
would have to pay living wages to blue-collar Americans." Sure,
there would be an economic impact if illegals weren't here,
but that wouldn't be altogether a bad thing.†Perhaps it would
help reduce the poverty level while relieving the burden
on the taxpayers who pay the education, medical, and law-enforcement
bills associated with illegal immigration.
Sure, we have our problems, but I think Professor Brady paints
an unrealistically gloomy picture of the land of the free.
Phil Clutts '61
Charlotte, North Carolina
Rather than concede the tremendous success this great, capitalist
nation has achieved in reducing poverty, it appears liberals
and socialists must now resort to new definitions of poverty
to make the U.S. look bad compared to European and other more
socialist countries. Dr. Brady considers U.S. Census Bureau
poverty rates to be dishonest. Rather than focus on the absolute
standard of living of the poor, where the U.S. leads the world,
he prefers to define poverty as living in a household with
less than 50 percent of the median household income after taxes
and assistance.
Three simple examples illustrate the absurdity of his preferred
measure of poverty: 1) If the U.S. pursued policies which resulted
in a doubling of every household's real income (i.e., inflation-adjusted,
after tax, due to productivity gains), his "poverty rate" would
remain the same, even though each household's standard of living
would have doubled. 2) If the U.S. pursued a policy that resulted
in a huge reduction in the incomes of those above the current
median with no benefit to those currently below the median
income, his "poverty rate" would drop accordingly,
despite no increase to the standard of living for the poor.
3) If the U.S. pursued policies which resulted in 55 percent,
including the median family, of the population existing on
three bowls of rice per day while the other 45 percent lived
like Paris Hilton, Dr. Brady's "poverty rate" would
be 0 percent!
As a country, we have a lot to do in our continued fight against
poverty. However, emulating the economic policies of countries
like Canada, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland,
and Spain, all of which have lower "poverty rates" as
defined by Dr. Brady, probably won't help.
Alfred W. Mordecai
B.S.E. '90
San Marino, California
|