|
Earlier this spring, the movement to institutionalize the study
of hip-hop in academe received a boost. The Smithsonian's National
Museum of American History announced that it would enshrine hip-hop
culture with an extensive exhibit tracing its evolution from a
Bronx pastime in the 1970s to today's global juggernaut.
Mark Anthony Neal, associate professor of black popular culture
in the African and African American Studies Program at Duke, has
explored the effects of hip-hop culture on black popular culture,
black women, and black intellectual production through both his
studies and his writing. His four books, What the Music Said: Black
Popular Music and Black Public Culture; Soul Babies: Black Popular
Culture and the Post-Soul Aesthetic; Songs in the Key of Black
Life: A Rhythm and Blues Nation; and, most recently, New Black
Man: Rethinking Black Masculinity, have earned him praise for his
ability to bridge the divide between academe and the public. Critic
Michael Eric Dyson has characterized him as "one of the most
brilliant cultural critics of his generation" and says that
Neal "writes gracefully, thinks sharply, speaks cogently,
and is old school and new school at once."
In April Neal, who is also a regular contributor to seeingblack.com
and to National Public Radio's News and Notes, had a public conversation
with Tracy Sharpley-Whiting, director of the program in African
American and Diaspora Studies at Vanderbilt University, at the
fourth annual Duke Magazine Campus Forum. Sharpley-Whiting teaches
a variety of subjects, including comparative diasporic literary
and cultural movements, critical race studies, feminist theory,
and film and hip-hop culture. She is also a professor of French
and director of the W.T. Bandy Center for Baudelaire and Modern
French Studies and has written several books: Negritude Women;
Black Venus: Sexualized Savages, Primal Fears, and Primitive Narrative
in French; and Frantz Fanon: Conflicts and Feminisms.
At the forum, the two scholars sought to investigate how hip-hop
culture influences a wide spectrum of human interaction, ranging
from the idea of the strip club as a new "church" to
the tension between artistry and commercial values in music. What
follows is an edited transcript of the conversation.
On his intellectual "alter ego"
I want you to talk a little bit about
your "thugniggerintellectual" concept.
You know that is going to rattle some people.
I have an alter ego--my intellectual alter ego. My intellectual
alter ego is thugniggerintellectual--one word. And it's been something
I've been playing with for a while, because I've been trying to
work through in my mind a way to make the life of the mind available
and accessible to people who would never think about it as such.
I just became really attracted to this notion of where we look
for intellectual production. And it's not always in the places
where we think we're going to find it. So, I began to try to work
through this kind of persona. It's come to me at different moments,
particularly, in the past, doing my work in Starbucks. And folks
just fundamentally don't have an understanding of why I'm there
at two o'clock in the afternoon with a laptop and a bunch of books.
Folks are saying things to me, like, are you a numbers runner?
Are you taking bets? Are you a DJ? Do you sell mix tapes? The last
thing they're thinking about is that this cat is an intellectual.
So, I actually think of myself differently than people may perceive
me. I understand that. But folks will be more apt to think of me
as a thug and a nigger before they would ever think about me as
an intellectual. In fact, thinking of me as an intellectual is
the more dangerous thing because they have no grasp on that. I
mean all kinds of things that come up except this idea I'm an intellectual.
I wanted to embody this figure that comes into intellectual spaces
like a thug, who literally is fearful and menacing. I wanted to
use this idea of this intellectual persona to do some real kind
of "gangster" scholarship, if you will. All right, just
hard, hard-core intellectual thuggery. And what it really personifies
is how I'm thinking about being in these spaces when I'm not trying
to fit into these spaces. When I'm not trying to be the collegial
colleague. When I'm not trying to sell books. When I'm not trying
to get students into my classes. When I'm not trying to be politically
correct. This is this other persona. I wanted to really do a book
project that spoke to raising these kinds of questions, ultimately,
within this guise that, in some ways, identity is all performance.
And thugniggerintellecutal is just one of the identities that I
perform.
But there are those who, of course, are quite resistant to the
idea of the black intellectual intervening in this space and talking
over the dialogue of hip-hop. And so, I wonder if we could talk
a little bit about that and what kind of interventions do we make,
specifically, with respect to hip-hop?
Folks like Henry Louis "Skip" Gates Jr., Cornel West,
bell hooks, Michael Eric Dyson--black intellectuals, public intellectuals--were
called to duty to provide the labor to explain what these new urban
phenomena were.
So, whether it was the race riots in L.A. in 1992 or the case of
Skip Gates and 2 Live Crew recording a song that some felt was
vulgar or the O.J. Simpson trial, these folks were called to duty
to explain the significance of what this stuff was. And in some
ways, black, public intellectuals are able to dictate what kind
of conversations are going to happen in our society around race
and class and popular culture. The best example of that recently
is Michael Eric Dyson's very timely book on Hurricane Katrina [Come
Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster].
He's still out there trying to push his book, and, of course, selling
his ideas, but at the same time keeping the focus on what happened
and what didn't happen last September.
He understands better than anybody that part of selling your ideas
in the marketplace is selling the person behind the ideas. The
only way the ideas circulate is if a person does. And part of that
is about celebrity and personality culture. And so much of contemporary
hip-hop journalism, really, is about celebrity journalism. But
then, when you have that attention, what do you do with it? What
do we do when we have that kind of significant space?
We always have to [ask] ourselves, when we're dealing with the
bright lights, are we still having the kind of conversations that
allow us to bring the kind of ideas that we're committed to politically
into a wider forum?
continues on
page two. |