|
he
bagel section at Elisabetta Politi's neighborhood supermarket says
it all. Six months ago, shelf space devoted to the onetime low-fat
staple of health fanatics took up three long yards. Today, it's
less than half that."People are not buying rice, bread, pasta,
and bagels as much as before," observes Politi, the nutrition
manager of the Duke Diet & Fitness Center. "And for the
first time, they're eating more eggs. This low-carb trend has touched
everybody. Even people who are not overweight have begun thinking
that it's probably not a good idea to eat too many carbs."
Walk into any supermarket these days, and it's clear we've become
a low-carb nation. Products once touted as low fat have been reformulated
and remarketed to appeal to our new low-carb sensibilities. Dwindling
sales of bread, rice, and pasta at checkout lines are being replaced,
to the glee of many food manufacturers, by sharply rising sales
of much more expensive dairy products, meat snacks, and nuts. And
the trend shows no signs of slowing. This year, U.S. consumers
are expected to spend an estimated $30 billion on low-carb products,
up from $15 billion in 2003.
Most of these new products are being marketed to the 24 million
Americans now on low-carb diets and the estimated 44 million others
thinking about trying one in the next year. But they're also satisfying
the hunger pangs of millions of other Americans who, overweight
or not, have begun cutting back their carbohydrate intake as a
result of news reports and advertising blaming carbs, rather than
fat, as the culprit behind our nation's steadily expanding waistlines.
Critics of the Atkins, South Beach, Zone, and other low-carb diets--
including most of the medical establishment--have long contended
that most of the weight shed from these high-protein regimens is
due to water loss and that the diets are medically dangerous, unsustainable,
and nutritionally unsound. While they concede that a small percentage
of low-carb dieters do lose weight, they argue that the vast majority
end up regaining the weight they lost and more.
That mainstream view, however, is now under fire from recent clinical
trials at Duke, Harvard, and other respected medical institutions,
which discovered that weight losses among obese patients on Atkins
and other low-carb diets are not only real, they exceed the losses
on low-fat diets. While many of these studies also show no ill
effects and even some improvement to cholesterol levels from Atkins-style
diets, physicians wary of potential long-term effects continue
to recommend that their patients go low fat or avoid staying on
low-carb diets for longer than six months.
So what's the average American seeking good health--and maybe ten
fewer pounds--supposed to do in light of this conflicting advice?
Do we drop our low-fat diets and put the kibosh on fruit and grains?
Start loading up on low-carb (hold the bun) double cheeseburgers?
Politi and other health experts at Duke see a number of potential
risks for consumers getting caught up in the current low-carb mania.
"We do know that if you eat fewer carbohydrates, you're going
to replace them with protein and fat," she says. "And
eating a high-protein diet can raise your risk of cancer. There
are already some studies that have suggested that. It's definitely
not good for your kidneys, because your kidneys are the only organs
in your body that can break down and dispose of extra nitrogen
from the protein you're eating. If you're also not eating the same
amount of carbohydrate as before, you're also probably eating more
fat. And we know that a diet high in saturated fats is linked with
an increase in heart disease."
"There's also the concern that if you have a diet that's relatively
low in fruits and vegetables and whole grains, you might be missing
out on some nutritional elements that are important in reducing
cancer risk," warns Howard Eisenson, a professor of medicine
at Duke who directs the Duke Diet & Fitness Center. Eisenson
has a long list of people he wouldn't recommend going low carb,
because there are no studies on the diets' long-term health effects:
pregnant women, children, the elderly, and those at risk for impaired
kidney function, osteoporosis, or kidney stones.
"The decent studies on low-carb diets are in their infancy," he
says, adding that he recommends the traditional low-fat diet for
most patients at his center looking to lose weight. "Our low-fat
diet has the greatest weight of scientific work behind it. We've
been doing it for a long time. We feel most confident in this as
a way of life. If you haven't tried a traditional low-fat diet
in a very serious way in a well-supported setting such as this,
that's our leaning."
Low fat, however, has been the mantra for the past three decades
and, in case you haven't noticed, it hasn't done much to halt the
supersizing of America. Nearly two in three adults across the nation
are now defined as overweight, compared with less than half two
decades ago, and half of those are classified as obese, with a
body mass index, or BMI, of 30 or more. Among Americans, residents
of North Carolina weigh in among the heaviest, with more than 21
percent of the state's adults defined as obese, compared with 13
percent in 1991. Experts cite a number of reasons to explain how
we've grown so fat, so fast: declining physical activity, less
cooking at home, more eating at restaurants and fast-food outlets,
and increased portion sizes.
"Our society makes it really easy for us to consume more calories
than we can expend," says Politi. "We're surrounded by
a lot of calorically dense foods. We don't have as many opportunities
to move as before. And the food industry makes it difficult for
even the well-informed consumer to make healthy choices."
"You've got to eat less; you've got to exercise in moderation," says
Eisenson. "That's a simple message, but apparently it's very
complicated for people to apply." Another basic lesson we
forgot during our past obsession with low-fat foods is that calories
are calories, whether they're from carbs or fat. Many of us got
caught up in what nutritionists call the "Snackwells phenomenon"--the
mistaken belief that you can eat as much as you want as long as
it's low in fat. "There's no doubt that low-fat diets were
depriving too many dieters," says Politi. "They didn't
feel satisfied. One of the big arguments against them is that when
you eat more carbohydrates they enhance your appetite, because
they raise your blood sugar. Then, when your blood sugar crashes,
you feel like you're starving."
While we may feel starved, we're anything but. A quick glance around
the mall these days underlines the fact that Americans have become
the fattest people on the planet, having munched and slurped our
way to a national health crisis that threatens our future economy.
Earlier this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
reported that obesity, which killed 400,000 Americans in 2000,
may soon overtake smoking, which killed 435,000 during the same
year, as the leading preventable cause of disease in the United
States. Obesity and its health consequences--such as type 2 diabetes--now
cost the nation $117 billion a year. And many experts fear the
doubling and tripling of obesity rates for children and teens,
respectively, over the past twenty years have created a health-care
time bomb that will have an even more dramatic economic impact.
The sad fact that some 20 to 30 percent of teens are now considered
obese, compared with just 5 percent in the 1960s, suggests that
the growing girth of American adults is likely to continue for
many years, if not generations, unless we find ways to halt this
destructive trend.
"If kids make it into their teen years obese, they've got
an 80 percent likelihood of being obese as adults," says Eisenson. "And
most people gain weight through adulthood, especially overweight
people. So someone who starts adulthood already obese is likely
to have very severe weight problems as they go through life. And
we know that obesity correlates very strongly with premature death.
People lose years from their life. That's the biggest thing. And
even if you don't die, having high blood pressure, high cholesterol,
diabetes, all those things, predispose you to having heart disease."
continues on
page two. |